What motivates participation in violent political action: selective incentives or parochial altruism?
نویسندگان
چکیده
In standard models of decision making, participation in violent political action is understood as the product of instrumentally rational reasoning. According to this line of thinking, instrumentally rational individuals will participate in violent political action only if there are selective incentives that are limited to participants. We argue in favor of an alternate model of political violence where participants are motivated by moral commitments to collective sacred values. Correlative and experimental empirical evidence in the context of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict strongly supports this alternate view.
منابع مشابه
Intuitive Participation in Aggressive Intergroup Conflict: Evidence of Weak Versus Strong Parochial Altruism
A commentary on In intergroup conflict, self-sacrifice is stronger among pro-social individuals, and parochial altruism emerges especially among cognitively taxed individuals Humans are unusually cooperative and prosocial, sharing resources with kin and non-kin others. At the same time, they engage in violent intergroup conflict and discriminate against members of other groups. How can we expla...
متن کاملThe evolutionary interplay of intergroup conflict and altruism in humans: a review of parochial altruism theory and prospects for its extension.
Drawing on an idea proposed by Darwin, it has recently been hypothesized that violent intergroup conflict might have played a substantial role in the evolution of human cooperativeness and altruism. The central notion of this argument, dubbed 'parochial altruism', is that the two genetic or cultural traits, aggressiveness against the out-groups and cooperativeness towards the in-group, includin...
متن کاملAnalyzing the Costs of Collective Actions for Political, Administrative, and Economic Agents to Facilitate Investment
The processes of collective action of individuals within the government organization and the formation and modification of these processes in the private sector have fundamental differences with collective action. A collective action, either in the form of an activity or in the form of a reform of an entity, both has transaction costs for agents within the process. So, a collective action withi...
متن کاملWar as a moral imperative (not just practical politics by other means).
We present findings from one survey and five experiments carried out in the USA, Nigeria and the Middle East showing that judgements about the use of deadly intergroup violence are strikingly insensitive to quantitative indicators of success, or to perceptions of their efficacy. By demonstrating that judgements about the use of war are bounded by rules of deontological reasoning and parochial c...
متن کاملWartime Violence, Empathy, and Intergroup Altruism: Evidence from the Ivoirian Refugee Crisis in Liberia
This paper presents new theory and evidence on the link between intergroup violence and altruism in diverse post-conflict context. Theory from political science and psychology predicts that intergroup conflict causes ingroup solidarity and outgroup aggression that may persist after conflict’s end. In contrast, we argue that empathy born from violence can cause greater ingroup and outgroup altru...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
دوره 1167 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009